Sampat Dagdu Gole vs Satwashila Hindurao Shirke — 33/2024
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST110001142024
e-Filing Number
11-03-2024
Filing Number
44/2024
Filing Date
16-Mar-2024
Registration No
33/2024
Registration Date
16-Mar-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Medha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sampat Dagdu Gole
Adv. Vishal Mahadik
-
2.Uttam Dagadu Gole
Adv. Vishal Mahadik
-
3.Ganpat Dagadu Gole
Adv. Vishal Mahadik
-
4.Shalabai Alias Shalan Dnyandeo Dhanawade
Adv. Vishal Mahadik
-
5.Malan Ramchandra Parte
Adv. Vishal Mahadik
-
6.Subhadra Balku Gawade(Legal Heir)
Adv. Vishal Mahadik6.
-
7.Jayshri Dashrath Gawade
-
8.Chaturabai Maruti Dhnawade(Legal Heir)
Adv. Vishal Mahadik7.
-
9.Suresh Maruti Dhanawade
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satwashila Hindurao Shirke
-
2.Dattatray Jagnnath Gole
-
3.Manisha Vijay Mankumbre
-
4.Seema Amol Gavade
-
5.Vinod Sadashiv Gole
Case History
-
06-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
04-Feb-2026
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
16-Jan-2026
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
12-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed defendants 02 and 03's application to set aside the "no say and written statement" order against them in this partition and injunction suit over agricultural land. The defendants were granted permission to file their written statement and say, despite delays of 6-7 months, considering the nature of the suit and interest of justice. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 to be paid to the plaintiffs as penalty for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
10-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
28-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
30-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
24-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
20-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
16-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
10-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
08-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
20-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
24-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
28-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
18-Dec-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
28-Nov-2024
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
18-Oct-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
30-Sep-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
04-Sep-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
06-Aug-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
20-Jul-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
20-Jun-2024
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
26-Apr-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
28-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
20-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
18-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C. Medha
-
16-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2024
Summary: The court allowed defendants 02 and 03's application to set aside the "no say and written statement" order against them in this partition and injunction suit over agricultural land. The defendants were granted permission to file their written statement and say, despite delays of 6-7 months, considering the nature of the suit and interest of justice. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 to be paid to the plaintiffs as penalty for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts