Maruti Dhondiba Gole vs Dropadi Kondiba Gole Advocate - Gade P.P — 44/2019

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,5. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST100006032019

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

Filing Number

102/2019

Filing Date

16-10-2019

Registration No

44/2019

Registration Date

16-10-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mahabaleshwar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,5
Code of Civil Procedure Section order39rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

Maruti Dhondiba Gole

Adv. Dhumal V.D

Respondent(s)

Dropadi Kondiba Gole Advocate - Gade P.P

Balkrushna Kondiba Gole

Bramhdeo Kondiba Gole

Nanda Mahadeo @ Namdeo Sanas

Alka Ananda Wadkar

Seeta Dipak Jambhale

Abai Ganpat Wadkar

Anusaya Baban Gole

Dilip Baban Gole

Surekha Hanumant Shinde

Asha Sachin Wadkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar

06-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

31-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

19-12-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

07-11-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

19-09-2025

Dismissal Order

Interim Orders

06-03-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application to amend the partition suit plaint by adding two defendants (Shantabai Gole and Chaya Chaudhari as Defendants 13 and 14) was rejected. The court found that citing "oversight" and "typographical mistake" as reasons was insufficient and improper grounds for amendment, particularly since the suit was filed in 2019 and defendants had already filed written statements. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application to amend the partition suit plaint by adding two defendants (Shantabai Gole and Chaya Chaudhari as Defendants 13 and 14) was rejected. The court found that citing "oversight" and "typographical mistake" as reasons was insufficient and improper grounds for amendment, particularly since the suit was filed in 2019 and defendants had already filed written statements. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mahabaleshwar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case