Sanjay Chandrakant Panchal vs Laxman Shankar Gole Advocate - Manjalkar L.R. — 67/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section possession. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST100004992023
Filing Number
126/2023
Filing Date
16-Sep-2023
Registration No
67/2023
Registration Date
16-Sep-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mahabaleshwar
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanjay Chandrakant Panchal
Adv. Bhandari H.J.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Laxman Shankar Gole Advocate - Manjalkar L.R.
-
2.Amit Laxman Gole
-
3.Kaleshwari Sah. Housing Society Through Madhukar Gole
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
20-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
16-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
28-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
03-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
29-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
25-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
27-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
24-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
25-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
28-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
21-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
28-Sep-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
12-Aug-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
08-Jul-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Civil Judge rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary and mandatory injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 (R.C.S. No. 67/2023). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as development agreements do not transfer actual physical possession and the plaintiff lacked legal standing since the original lease holders were not made parties to the suit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jul-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
21-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
30-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
14-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
22-Feb-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
11-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
14-Dec-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
23-Nov-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
19-Oct-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
07-Oct-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
-
20-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2023
Summary The Civil Judge rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary and mandatory injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 (R.C.S. No. 67/2023). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as development agreements do not transfer actual physical possession and the plaintiff lacked legal standing since the original lease holders were not made parties to the suit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts