Ravindra Baburao Dabade vs Chandsab Ibrahim Khatik Advocate - Sanas U.H — 1600067/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST100003912015
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
Filing Number
1600126/2015
Filing Date
21-10-2015
Registration No
1600067/2015
Registration Date
21-10-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mahabaleshwar
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravindra Baburao Dabade
Adv. Chorage S.S.
Sandhya Ravindra Dabade
Adv. Yadav R.R
Respondent(s)
Chandsab Ibrahim Khatik Advocate - Sanas U.H
Shahajan Yakub Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Allabaksha Yakub Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Najir Yakub Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Shabbir Yadkub Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Ayub Yakub Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Shafik Yakub Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Surayya Ayub Choudhari
Adv. Sanas U.H
Shahanaj Moiddin Kureshi @ Shaikh
Adv. Sanas U.H
Munni Jafar Allarakhe
Adv. Sanas U.H
Amin Mohmada Hanif Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Nasir Mohmad Hanif Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Jakir Mohmad Hanif Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Farida Mohmad Hanif KHatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Malika Mohmad Hanif Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Firoja Mohmad Hanif Khatik
Adv. Sanas U.H
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 31-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 14-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary All three applications (Exh.21, 22 & 23) filed by defendants seeking rejection/return of the plaint in this injunction case were rejected by the court on 06/11/2015. The court found that the plaintiff's suit for injunction simplicitor cannot be dismissed at the pre-trial stage on the grounds raised by defendants regarding building permission, procedural compliance, or necessary parties. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary All three applications (Exh.21, 22 & 23) filed by defendants seeking rejection/return of the plaint in this injunction case were rejected by the court on 06/11/2015. The court found that the plaintiff's suit for injunction simplicitor cannot be dismissed at the pre-trial stage on the grounds raised by defendants regarding building permission, procedural compliance, or necessary parties. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts