Shri.Kachchi Visa Oswal Sthanakvasi Jain Mahajan Tarfe Vishwast 1-Shri. Atul Chunnilala Bheda vs Chief Officer Panchgani Muncipal Council Advocate - Jaikar S. V. — 2/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section injunction. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST100000292021
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
4/2021
Filing Date
25-01-2021
Registration No
2/2021
Registration Date
26-01-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mahabaleshwar
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri.Kachchi Visa Oswal Sthanakvasi Jain Mahajan Tarfe Vishwast 1-Shri. Atul Chunnilala Bheda
Adv. Herkal P.V
Shri.Kekin Kuvarji Chheda
Vinesh Visanji Mamaniya
Adv. Herkal P.V
Dhiraj Devaji Rambhiya
Adv. Herkal P.V
Respondent(s)
Chief Officer Panchgani Muncipal Council Advocate - Jaikar S. V.
Dr. Ajay Kalyani Visarani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Mahabaleshwar
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 31-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 19-12-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 14-11-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 19-09-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Interim Orders
Summary The application for temporary injunction filed by Shree Kutchi Visa Oswal Sthanikwasi Jain Mahajan against Panchgani Municipal Council was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable loss. The court upheld the Municipal Council's public development work of constructing a footpath on road side margins, noting that the plaintiff had not demonstrated legal possession or rights over the disputed area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The application for temporary injunction filed by Shree Kutchi Visa Oswal Sthanikwasi Jain Mahajan against Panchgani Municipal Council was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable loss. The court upheld the Municipal Council's public development work of constructing a footpath on road side margins, noting that the plaintiff had not demonstrated legal possession or rights over the disputed area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts