Rajshri Sangarm Patil vs Ganpat Shankar Dhumal — 272/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S 54. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST090012512024
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
04-10-2024
Filing Number
392/2024
Filing Date
05-10-2024
Registration No
272/2024
Registration Date
05-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Koregaon
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Koregaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajshri Sangarm Patil
Adv. Dhumal V.B.
Respondent(s)
Ganpat Shankar Dhumal
Ramdas Ganpat Dhumal
Shivprasad Ganpat Dhumal
Adarsh Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahkari Patsanstha Maryadit, Sonake
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Koregaon
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Steps |
| 21-01-2026 | Steps |
| 28-11-2025 | Steps |
| 18-10-2025 | Steps |
| 17-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court granted the petitioner's applications (Petitions No. 5 and 66). The court found that while the property was mortgaged to Respondent 4 by Respondent 2, the petitioner failed to prove her legal ownership rights or possession of the property through documentary evidence, and the bank's recovery proceedings against Respondent 2 were legally valid, making court intervention inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court granted the petitioner's applications (Petitions No. 5 and 66). The court found that while the property was mortgaged to Respondent 4 by Respondent 2, the petitioner failed to prove her legal ownership rights or possession of the property through documentary evidence, and the bank's recovery proceedings against Respondent 2 were legally valid, making court intervention inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts