Sangeeta Ganesh Jadhav vs Mahesh Ashok Jadhav etc — 85/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,452,354A,504,506,rw34. Status: Verification. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHST090005402022
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
394/2022
Filing Date
18-04-2022
Registration No
85/2022
Registration Date
18-04-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Koregaon
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Koregaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sangeeta Ganesh Jadhav
Adv. Mahangade A.P.
Respondent(s)
Mahesh Ashok Jadhav etc
Sagar Ashok Jadhav
Ashok Tatyaba Jadhav
Akshay Amitkumar Jadhav
Akash Amitkumar Jadhav
Prakash Laxman Jadhav
Bharti Ashok Jadhav
Shalan Mahesh Jadhav
Usha Malhari Madane
Sharada Arun Jadhav
Savita Prakash Jadhav
Akkatai Bhagwan Jadhav
Bhagwan Tatyaba Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Koregaon
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Verification |
| 16-01-2026 | Verification |
| 12-12-2025 | Verification |
| 14-11-2025 | Verification |
| 10-10-2025 | Verification |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Criminal Revision Application No. 65/2022, Nanded, Order on Petition No. 1 Outcome: The petition under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking directions to lodge an FIR is dismissed. The court found that the complainant failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of Section 154(3) CrPC. The case is adjourned for verification of complainant and other witness statements under Section 200 CrPC on the next date of hearing. Key Issue: The complaint involved allegations of harassment, assault, and molestation by 13 accused persons, but the court rejected the FIR direction application due to procedural non-compliance by the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Criminal Revision Application No. 65/2022, Nanded, Order on Petition No. 1 Outcome: The petition under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking directions to lodge an FIR is dismissed. The court found that the complainant failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of Section 154(3) CrPC. The case is adjourned for verification of complainant and other witness statements under Section 200 CrPC on the next date of hearing. Key Issue: The complaint involved allegations of harassment, assault, and molestation by 13 accused persons, but the court rejected the FIR direction application due to procedural non-compliance by the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts