Ganpat Bhausaheb Jadhav vs Suresh Bhiku Jadhav Advocate - Chavan R.M — 73/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST080010072018

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

149/2018

Filing Date

07-06-2018

Registration No

73/2018

Registration Date

07-06-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Ganpat Bhausaheb Jadhav

Adv. Chavan.R.E.

Respondent(s)

Suresh Bhiku Jadhav Advocate - Chavan R.M

Ravindra Bhiku Jadhav

Sampat Mahadeo Jadhav

Mandaladhikari Shirwal

Mojni Adhikari Shirwal

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-11-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

12-09-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-06-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

27-11-2018
Order on T.I.
02-05-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court dismissed the preliminary objection application filed by respondents 1 and 2 under CPC Order 7 Rule 11, holding that the court has jurisdiction to proceed with the civil suit. The court found that while respondents 4 and 5 are government officers, prior sanction requirements were properly followed, and the absence of claims against the government does not bar the suit. The application is rejected and the case shall continue in this court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the preliminary objection application filed by respondents 1 and 2 under CPC Order 7 Rule 11, holding that the court has jurisdiction to proceed with the civil suit. The court found that while respondents 4 and 5 are government officers, prior sanction requirements were properly followed, and the absence of claims against the government does not bar the suit. The application is rejected and the case shall continue in this court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case