Balu Sadhu Kale(Legal Heir) vs Vitthal Bhagu Kale — 1000217/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST080008952014

Steps

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

Filing Number

1000314/2014

Filing Date

30-12-2014

Registration No

1000217/2014

Registration Date

30-12-2014

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Balu Sadhu Kale(Legal Heir)

Adv. Dahiwal A.J.1.

Shalan Balu Kale 1.

Dattatray Balu Kale 1.

Sunil Balu Kale 1.

Satish Balu Kale

Santosh Sadhu Kale

Respondent(s)

Vitthal Bhagu Kale

Krushna Shankar Kale

Bhau Satu kale

Mahadev Satu Kale

Shidu Satu Kale

Changdev Baba Pise

Eknath Baba Pise

Hasina Harun Kazi

Shidu Mhatu Mote

Kondabai Kushaba Pise

Bhanudas Khushaba Pise

Jijaba Rambhau Mote

Mhatu Rambhau Mote

Gangram Rambhau Mote

Narayan Rambhau Mote

Rakhmabai Jijaba Mote

Uttam Nana Mote

Sunil Laxman Mote

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.

06-03-2026

Steps

21-01-2026

Steps

12-11-2025

Steps

15-09-2025

Steps

23-06-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

08-08-2022
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court dismissed petitions No. 34 and 39 filed by the appellant, finding them lacking in merit and not maintainable under law. The court ordered the appellant to correct defects in the petition within a specified period and file a corrected application, while directing both parties to note the order. Costs were imposed on the appellant for any future defective filings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed petitions No. 34 and 39 filed by the appellant, finding them lacking in merit and not maintainable under law. The court ordered the appellant to correct defects in the petition within a specified period and file a corrected application, while directing both parties to note the order. Costs were imposed on the appellant for any future defective filings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case