Raju Narayan Bhargude vs Hirabai Dyanoba Bhargude Advocate - mukadam — 160/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 39,R 1-2. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST080007192024
e-Filing Number
21-06-2024
Filing Number
198/2024
Filing Date
24-Jun-2024
Registration No
160/2024
Registration Date
25-Jun-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju Narayan Bhargude
Adv. पंडीत बी.डब्ल्यू.
-
2.Ramdas Narayan Bhargude
Adv. Pandit C.B.
-
3.Lakshmi Narayan Bhargude
Adv. Pandit C.B.
-
4.Dattatrey Namdev Bhargade
Adv. Pandit C.B.
-
5.Prakash Namdev Bhargude
Adv. Pandit C.B.
-
6.Yamunabai Kishan Bhargude
Adv. Pandit C.B.
-
7.Navnath Kisan Bhargude
Adv. Pandit C.B.
-
8.Santosh Kishan Bhargude
Adv. Pandit C.B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hirabai Dyanoba Bhargude Advocate - mukadam
-
2.Manoj Dyanoba Bargude
Adv. mukadam
-
3.Lata Kailash Phadtare
-
4.Chandrabhaga Lakshman Khopade
-
5.Rekha Ram Gulumkar
-
6.Tushar Mohan Bhargude
-
7.Abhijeet Shivaji Kabule
-
8.Sachin Bhaskar Kale
-
9.Monali Tanaji Thopate
-
10.Sunil Pandharinath Kale
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Issues
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
19-Dec-2025
Issues
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
31-Oct-2025
Issues
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
12-Sep-2025
Issues
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
04-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary RCS No. 160/2024 | Khandala Civil Court | Dated 04.08.2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from disturbing their alleged possession of a 13-acre plot (Gat No. 1524) in Satara district. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they admitted the entire property was registered in defendants' names and provided only photographs as evidence of possession, without documentary proof of actual encroachment or hindrance by defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Aug-2025
Issues
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
01-Aug-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
25-Jul-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
18-Jul-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
27-Jun-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
11-Apr-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
29-Mar-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
13-Mar-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
04-Feb-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
03-Jan-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
20-Dec-2024
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
29-Nov-2024
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
15-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
11-Oct-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
27-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
17-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
09-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
26-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
16-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
09-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
26-Jun-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
26-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
-
25-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 160/2024
Case Summary RCS No. 160/2024 | Khandala Civil Court | Dated 04.08.2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from disturbing their alleged possession of a 13-acre plot (Gat No. 1524) in Satara district. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they admitted the entire property was registered in defendants' names and provided only photographs as evidence of possession, without documentary proof of actual encroachment or hindrance by defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts