Sunil Jijaba Yadav Gulumkar vs Subhdar Tukaram Yadav Othr 2 Advocate - S.K.Pathan — 1000163/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST080006332012
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
1000163/2012
Filing Date
07-07-2012
Registration No
1000163/2012
Registration Date
04-08-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Jijaba Yadav Gulumkar
Adv. Rajepandhare D.K.
Ravindra Gejaba Yadav Galumkar
Adv. D.K.Rajepandhare
Tanaji Gejaba Yadav Galumkar
Respondent(s)
Subhdar Tukaram Yadav Othr 2 Advocate - S.K.Pathan
Sharmaro Baban Yadav
Ramdas Baban Yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the defendants' application to amend their written statement by adding a paragraph claiming ownership of the suit property through adverse possession from 05/05/1989. The court found the amendment necessary to decide the real controversy between parties and allowed defendants to raise contradictory pleas in their written statement. The defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 as cost to the plaintiff and file the amended written statement within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the defendants' application to amend their written statement by adding a paragraph claiming ownership of the suit property through adverse possession from 05/05/1989. The court found the amendment necessary to decide the real controversy between parties and allowed defendants to raise contradictory pleas in their written statement. The defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 as cost to the plaintiff and file the amended written statement within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts