Shaukatbhai Bandubhai Shekh vs Santosh Ashok Jadhav — 82/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST080003532022

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

Filing Number

131/2022

Filing Date

25-04-2022

Registration No

82/2022

Registration Date

26-04-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Shaukatbhai Bandubhai Shekh

Adv. Khan I. D.

Munirbhai Bandubhai Shekh

Ikbal Bandubhai Shekh

Aazad Bandubhai Shekh

Respondent(s)

Santosh Ashok Jadhav

Sanjay Namdev Pansare

Sagar Namdev Pansare

Gulab Namdev Pansare

Ruksha Ankush Pawar

Rekha Laxman Bhosale

Suresh Sukhdev Parkhande

Prakash Sukhdev Parkhande

Baby Babasaheb Pawar

Mangal Kishor Chavan

Sharda Dilip Chavan

Jayashree Rajendra Aatole

Nanda Sanjay Aatole

Shalan Vikas Chavan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.

06-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

24-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

17-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

18-08-2025

Awaiting Summons

12-06-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

21-05-2022
Order on T.I.
02-04-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary The plaintiff's petition (Under Order 26, Rule 9 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908) for appointment of Court Commissioner to measure the disputed property and restrain alleged encroachment by the defendant was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff had not established a valid basis for the requested relief, as prior surveys (2014 and 2015) had already been conducted and showed no encroachment on the defendant's property boundaries. The court ruled that the plaintiff must establish their case through their own evidence rather than relying on fresh court-ordered measurements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The plaintiff's petition (Under Order 26, Rule 9 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908) for appointment of Court Commissioner to measure the disputed property and restrain alleged encroachment by the defendant was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff had not established a valid basis for the requested relief, as prior surveys (2014 and 2015) had already been conducted and showed no encroachment on the defendant's property boundaries. The court ruled that the plaintiff must establish their case through their own evidence rather than relying on fresh court-ordered measurements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case