Ramchandra Alias Ramdas Sopan Shelke vs Laxman Sopan Shelke — 38/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 467, 468, 34. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST080000552024
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
24-01-2024
Filing Number
27/2024
Filing Date
29-01-2024
Registration No
38/2024
Registration Date
05-02-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramchandra Alias Ramdas Sopan Shelke
Adv. Sampat Kale
Respondent(s)
Laxman Sopan Shelke
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
Issues
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 16-01-2026 | Issues |
| 22-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
| 11-11-2025 | Order on Exh |
| 14-10-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by the defendant for a temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiff from obstructing his possession and crop-cutting on disputed agricultural properties in Satara district has been rejected. The Civil Judge found that the defendant failed to establish a prima facie case of settled possession with sufficient evidence, noting that mere revenue record entries do not conclusively prove possession when disputed, and that actual possession must be determined at a later stage of the main suit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by the defendant for a temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiff from obstructing his possession and crop-cutting on disputed agricultural properties in Satara district has been rejected. The Civil Judge found that the defendant failed to establish a prima facie case of settled possession with sufficient evidence, noting that mere revenue record entries do not conclusively prove possession when disputed, and that actual possession must be determined at a later stage of the main suit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts