The State Of Maharashtra-State Excise Office vs Vishal Raghunath Tupe — 3747/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e),81,83,90. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHST070055022024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
4745/2024
Filing Date
26-11-2024
Registration No
3747/2024
Registration Date
27-11-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karad
Judge
5-5th Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-State Excise Office
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vishal Raghunath Tupe
Hearing History
Judge: 5-5th Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
Awaiting Summons
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 25-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Pandurang Daulat Patil under Section 497 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for custody of a seized Ashok Leland vehicle was allowed. The applicant is entitled to receive the vehicle upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 10,00,000 and subject to conditions including: producing the vehicle as directed by courts, not using it for any offense, providing photographs for identification, and not disposing of, selling, mortgaging, or altering the vehicle without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Pandurang Daulat Patil under Section 497 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for custody of a seized Ashok Leland vehicle was allowed. The applicant is entitled to receive the vehicle upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 10,00,000 and subject to conditions including: producing the vehicle as directed by courts, not using it for any offense, providing photographs for identification, and not disposing of, selling, mortgaging, or altering the vehicle without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts