Vitthal Dnyandev Thorat vs Hindurao Kondiba Jadhav — 499/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST070050202024
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
21-10-2024
Filing Number
704/2024
Filing Date
22-10-2024
Registration No
499/2024
Registration Date
24-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karad
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vitthal Dnyandev Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
Shivaji Dnyandev Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
Ramchandra Dnyandev Thorat(Legal Heir)
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.
Nandini Ramchandra Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.
Niranjankumar Ramchandra Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.
Anuradha Ninad More
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
Mohan Baburao Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
Nilam Arun Jadhav
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
Respondent(s)
Hindurao Kondiba Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 11-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 29-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The court held that the plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction regarding property (Block No. 48) is maintainable under Section 138(4) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff filed within one year of ejectment notice. The court found that statutory bars cited by the defendant (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act sections) apply only to suits against the Government, not private parties, and title disputes fall within civil court jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The court held that the plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction regarding property (Block No. 48) is maintainable under Section 138(4) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff filed within one year of ejectment notice. The court found that statutory bars cited by the defendant (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act sections) apply only to suits against the Government, not private parties, and title disputes fall within civil court jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts