Vitthal Dnyandev Thorat vs Hindurao Kondiba Jadhav — 499/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST070050202024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

21-10-2024

Filing Number

704/2024

Filing Date

22-10-2024

Registration No

499/2024

Registration Date

24-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karad

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Vitthal Dnyandev Thorat

Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More

Shivaji Dnyandev Thorat

Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More

Ramchandra Dnyandev Thorat(Legal Heir)

Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.

Nandini Ramchandra Thorat

Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.

Niranjankumar Ramchandra Thorat

Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.

Anuradha Ninad More

Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More

Mohan Baburao Thorat

Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More

Nilam Arun Jadhav

Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More

Respondent(s)

Hindurao Kondiba Jadhav

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

11-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

29-10-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-09-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

17-02-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The court held that the plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction regarding property (Block No. 48) is maintainable under Section 138(4) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff filed within one year of ejectment notice. The court found that statutory bars cited by the defendant (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act sections) apply only to suits against the Government, not private parties, and title disputes fall within civil court jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The court held that the plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction regarding property (Block No. 48) is maintainable under Section 138(4) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff filed within one year of ejectment notice. The court found that statutory bars cited by the defendant (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act sections) apply only to suits against the Government, not private parties, and title disputes fall within civil court jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Karad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case