Vitthal Dnyandev Thorat vs Hindurao Kondiba Jadhav — 499/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST070050202024
e-Filing Number
21-10-2024
Filing Number
704/2024
Filing Date
22-Oct-2024
Registration No
499/2024
Registration Date
24-Oct-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karad
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vitthal Dnyandev Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
-
2.Shivaji Dnyandev Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
-
3.Ramchandra Dnyandev Thorat(Legal Heir)
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.
-
4.Nandini Ramchandra Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.
-
5.Niranjankumar Ramchandra Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More3.
-
6.Anuradha Ninad More
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
-
7.Mohan Baburao Thorat
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
-
8.Nilam Arun Jadhav
Adv. Nitin Sambhaji More
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hindurao Kondiba Jadhav
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
-
06-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
-
11-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
-
29-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
-
17-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
-
04-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
-
18-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karad
-
10-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
25-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
17-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The court held that the plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction regarding property (Block No. 48) is maintainable under Section 138(4) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff filed within one year of ejectment notice. The court found that statutory bars cited by the defendant (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act sections) apply only to suits against the Government, not private parties, and title disputes fall within civil court jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
05-Feb-2025
Order on Exh
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
04-Feb-2025
Order on Exh
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
01-Feb-2025
Order on Exh
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
31-Jan-2025
Order on Exh
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
02-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
20-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
21-Nov-2024
W.S. and Say
6th Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
25-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 499/2024
Summary: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The court held that the plaintiff's suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction regarding property (Block No. 48) is maintainable under Section 138(4) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff filed within one year of ejectment notice. The court found that statutory bars cited by the defendant (Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act sections) apply only to suits against the Government, not private parties, and title disputes fall within civil court jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts