Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Karad vs Swarajya Recreation Director Mahesh Ramchandra Dharmadhikari — 783/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHST070011792025
e-Filing Number
13-03-2025
Filing Number
966/2025
Filing Date
15-Mar-2025
Registration No
783/2025
Registration Date
26-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karad
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jankalyan Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Karad
Adv. KULKARNI VIKRAM VISHWAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Swarajya Recreation Director Mahesh Ramchandra Dharmadhikari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Lokadalat disposed of the cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) after the accused paid the disputed cheque amount, and the complainant withdrew the complaint. The accused was acquitted, bail bonds were cancelled, and court fees were refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
12-Mar-2026
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
06-Mar-2026
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
20-Jan-2026
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
11-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
25-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
10-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D J.M.F.C. Karad.
-
27-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 783/2025
The Lokadalat disposed of the cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) after the accused paid the disputed cheque amount, and the complainant withdrew the complaint. The accused was acquitted, bail bonds were cancelled, and court fees were refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts