Sagar Bahadur Bohara vs The State Of Maharashtra-Umbraj Police Station Advocate - APP — 53/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHST070011252026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
1021/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Karad
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Karad.
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sagar Bahadur Bohara
Adv. JAGDALE SANKET ANKUSHRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra-Umbraj Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the application of Sagar Bahadur Bohara for interim custody of his seized OPPO A17 mobile phone, finding that he established ownership through FIR copy, mobile bill, and Aadhar card, and that mere police speculation about destruction was insufficient grounds for denial. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 12,500 indemnity bond, prohibition on sale/transfer, mandatory production before court, preservation of the device, and photographic documentation before custody transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Karad.
-
20-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Karad.
-
16-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Karad.
-
12-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Karad.
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2026
Summary: The court allowed the application of Sagar Bahadur Bohara for interim custody of his seized OPPO A17 mobile phone, finding that he established ownership through FIR copy, mobile bill, and Aadhar card, and that mere police speculation about destruction was insufficient grounds for denial. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 12,500 indemnity bond, prohibition on sale/transfer, mandatory production before court, preservation of the device, and photographic documentation before custody transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts