Dinesh Gajanan Kashid vs Sarkar ( Dahiwadi Police Station) — 30/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHST060002462026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
154/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
30/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dahiwadi
Judge
1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Dahiwadi
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dinesh Gajanan Kashid
Adv. CHAVAN NITIN LALASAHEB
Respondent(s)
Sarkar ( Dahiwadi Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Dahiwadi
Disposed
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 11-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Dahiwadi Judicial Magistrate Court allowed Dinesh Gajanan Kashid's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering release of his seized iPhone to his interim custody until trial conclusion. The court found him prima facie owner based on purchase receipts and Aadhar card, rejecting the investigating officer's concerns about misuse, noting that keeping the device idle would deteriorate its condition. Release was granted subject to conditions including a ₹15,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on disposal/modification, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Dahiwadi Judicial Magistrate Court allowed Dinesh Gajanan Kashid's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering release of his seized iPhone to his interim custody until trial conclusion. The court found him prima facie owner based on purchase receipts and Aadhar card, rejecting the investigating officer's concerns about misuse, noting that keeping the device idle would deteriorate its condition. Release was granted subject to conditions including a ₹15,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on disposal/modification, and production on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts