Popat Jaganath Jagdale(Legal Heir) vs Sampat Jagnath Jagdale Advocate - Bhosale K.D. — 3/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST060000042017

Hearing

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

Filing Number

3/2017

Filing Date

05-01-2017

Registration No

3/2017

Registration Date

05-01-2017

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dahiwadi

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Dahiwadi

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Popat Jaganath Jagdale(Legal Heir)

Adv. Karande P.D.1.

Salan Popat Jagadale 1.

Sandip Popat Jagadale 1.

Rupali Santosh Nalvade

Hanmant Jagnnath Jagdale

Respondent(s)

Sampat Jagnath Jagdale Advocate - Bhosale K.D.

Sou. Anusaya Sampat Jagdale

Maruti Sampat Jagdale

Vijay Sampat Jagdale

Sou. Sujata Manoj Magar

Dilip Jaganath Jagdale

Lalaso Jaganath Jagdale(Legal Heir)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Dahiwadi

06-03-2026

Hearing

02-02-2026

Hearing

02-12-2025

Hearing

17-11-2025

Hearing

15-11-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

04-09-2023
Order on T.I.

Summary: The plaintiff's application for appointment of a court commissioner under Order 26 Rules 9 and 10 has been rejected. The court held that a court commissioner cannot be appointed for the purpose of collecting evidence, and the plaintiff must prove their case through leading evidence at trial. The cited case laws regarding boundary disputes were found inapplicable to this declaration and perpetual injunction suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application for appointment of a court commissioner under Order 26 Rules 9 and 10 has been rejected. The court held that a court commissioner cannot be appointed for the purpose of collecting evidence, and the plaintiff must prove their case through leading evidence at trial. The cited case laws regarding boundary disputes were found inapplicable to this declaration and perpetual injunction suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dahiwadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case