Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Branch Karad vs Nilesh Namdeo Gorave — 1969/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21, 11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast
CNR: MHST050035212023
Filing Number
2660/2023
Filing Date
14-10-2021
Registration No
1969/2023
Registration Date
14-10-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Branch Karad
Adv. Kshirsagar Ravindra T.
Respondent(s)
Nilesh Namdeo Gorave
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 20-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 13-10-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 08-07-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the execution petition filed by Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. in default because the defendant failed to comply with the court's order to produce documents relating to the arbitrator's appointment. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court held that if the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral (violating Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act), the arbitral award cannot be executed for lack of jurisdiction, making production of these documents essential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the execution petition filed by Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. in default because the defendant failed to comply with the court's order to produce documents relating to the arbitrator's appointment. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court held that if the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral (violating Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act), the arbitral award cannot be executed for lack of jurisdiction, making production of these documents essential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts