Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Branch Karad vs Akbar Babu Mujawar — 246/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast
CNR: MHST050029502023
Filing Number
933/2023
Filing Date
01-02-2018
Registration No
246/2023
Registration Date
01-02-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Branch Karad
Adv. Ingavale J.D
Respondent(s)
Akbar Babu Mujawar
Vilas Vithoba Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Awaiting Warrant
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 19-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 03-11-2025 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.'s execution petition against Akbar Babu Mujawar in default for non-compliance. The defendant failed to produce documents regarding the arbitrator's appointment despite court orders, leading the court to draw an adverse inference that the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus invalid under Arbitration Act Section 18/12(5), following Supreme Court precedent that such awards cannot be executed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.'s execution petition against Akbar Babu Mujawar in default for non-compliance. The defendant failed to produce documents regarding the arbitrator's appointment despite court orders, leading the court to draw an adverse inference that the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus invalid under Arbitration Act Section 18/12(5), following Supreme Court precedent that such awards cannot be executed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts