Mahadev Dhondiram Kadam vs Rajendra Bhimrao Gaikawad Advocate - Jadhav B. B. — 23/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O/37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Sum.Civ.Suit - Summary Civil Suit
CNR: MHST050010022024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
14-08-2024
Filing Number
1035/2024
Filing Date
14-08-2024
Registration No
23/2024
Registration Date
03-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
2-Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadev Dhondiram Kadam
Adv. PATIL VIJAYSINH PANDURANG
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Bhimrao Gaikawad Advocate - Jadhav B. B.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Karad allowed the defendant's application for production of documents in Summary Suit No.23/2024 (Mahadev Dhondiram Kadam v. Rajendra Bhimrao Gaikwad). Permission was granted to the defendant to produce documents listed in Exhibit 22 on record in support of his pending application for leave to defend, as these documents were found necessary to determine the real questions in controversy and would cause no prejudice to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Karad allowed the defendant's application for production of documents in Summary Suit No.23/2024 (Mahadev Dhondiram Kadam v. Rajendra Bhimrao Gaikwad). Permission was granted to the defendant to produce documents listed in Exhibit 22 on record in support of his pending application for leave to defend, as these documents were found necessary to determine the real questions in controversy and would cause no prejudice to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts