Vrushabh Popat Pawar vs Ramesh Baburao Mane Advocate - Patil N. S. — 17/2021
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 276. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
Probate
CNR: MHST050009502021
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
949/2021
Filing Date
20-12-2021
Registration No
17/2021
Registration Date
21-12-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vrushabh Popat Pawar
Adv. Madane A. T.
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Baburao Mane Advocate - Patil N. S.
Jaykar Baburao Mane
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The application filed by the third parties (Ramesh Baburao Mane & Ors.) in Probate No.17 of 2021 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Karad, was allowed. The court granted permission to the third parties to produce additional documents (listed in Exh.29) in support of their interim application, finding that the documents are necessary to determine the real questions in controversy and that allowing their production would not prejudice the applicant while ensuring fair opportunity for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The application filed by the third parties (Ramesh Baburao Mane & Ors.) in Probate No.17 of 2021 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Karad, was allowed. The court granted permission to the third parties to produce additional documents (listed in Exh.29) in support of their interim application, finding that the documents are necessary to determine the real questions in controversy and that allowing their production would not prejudice the applicant while ensuring fair opportunity for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts