Bank Of Maharashtra Through Manager Kumar Ganapati Kshirsagar vs Rohit Enterprises Prop. Adhik Namdeo Pawar — 136/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Recovery. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHST050008382022

Filing Number

846/2022

Filing Date

03-Dec-2022

Registration No

136/2022

Registration Date

05-Dec-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karad

Judge

2-Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Recovery

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bank Of Maharashtra Through Manager Kumar Ganapati Kshirsagar

    Adv. Kolekar S.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rohit Enterprises Prop. Adhik Namdeo Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Civil Judge Senior Division, Karad disposed of Bank of Maharashtra's suit against Rohit Enterprises as withdrawn under Order 23 Rule 1 of the CPC, 1908, after the authorized person of the bank admitted the contents of a compromise award. Court fees were ordered to be refunded as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  7. 13-Sep-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  8. 25-Jul-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  9. 11-Apr-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  10. 31-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 31-Jan-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  12. 06-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  13. 10-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  14. 20-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  15. 14-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  16. 13-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  17. 09-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  18. 22-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  19. 19-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  20. 24-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  21. 23-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  22. 17-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  23. 27-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

  24. 06-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 03-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 136/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge Senior Division, Karad disposed of Bank of Maharashtra's suit against Rohit Enterprises as withdrawn under Order 23 Rule 1 of the CPC, 1908, after the authorized person of the bank admitted the contents of a compromise award. Court fees were ordered to be refunded as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case