Anandrao Dynanu Urunkar vs Satish Dattatrya Phalle Advocate - Bahulekar P. M. — 195/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Injuction. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST050008012019
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
784/2019
Filing Date
16-05-2019
Registration No
195/2019
Registration Date
16-05-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anandrao Dynanu Urunkar
Adv. Tadakhe P. D.
Respondent(s)
Satish Dattatrya Phalle Advocate - Bahulekar P. M.
Ramesh Chandru Suryawanshi
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Steps_Unready
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Additional W.S.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 20-02-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 23-01-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 17-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-11-2025 | Additional W.S. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Civil Judge Senior Division, Karad Case: R.C.S. No.195/2019 | Anandrao Dnyanu Urunkar v. Satish Dattatray Phalle & Anr. Date: 06/09/2024 The plaintiff's application for condonation of delay in supplying the amended plaint copy was allowed with cost of Rs. 100/- imposed on the defendants. The court found the delay justified due to the plaintiff's illness and prior court adjournment, and directed that after payment/deposit of costs, the amended plaint copy be placed on record by the bench clerk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Civil Judge Senior Division, Karad Case: R.C.S. No.195/2019 | Anandrao Dnyanu Urunkar v. Satish Dattatray Phalle & Anr. Date: 06/09/2024 The plaintiff's application for condonation of delay in supplying the amended plaint copy was allowed with cost of Rs. 100/- imposed on the defendants. The court found the delay justified due to the plaintiff's illness and prior court adjournment, and directed that after payment/deposit of costs, the amended plaint copy be placed on record by the bench clerk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts