Ramchandra Maruti Shinde (Decessed Heair) Prakash Ramchandra Shinde vs Collector Satara Advocate - Madane V.S — 3/2018

Case under Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act (Maharashtra) Section Recovery. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference

CNR: MHST050007022018

Evidence

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

700/2018

Filing Date

12-09-2018

Registration No

3/2018

Registration Date

12-09-2018

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karad

Judge

6-4th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

Acts & Sections

Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act (Maharashtra) Section Recovery

Petitioner(s)

Ramchandra Maruti Shinde (Decessed Heair) Prakash Ramchandra Shinde

Adv. Dange A.R.

Respondent(s)

Collector Satara Advocate - Madane V.S

Special Land Acquition Officer No. 16, Satara

Adv. Madane V.S

Executive Engineer, Kanher Canal, Division No. 2, Karawadi

Hearing History

Judge: 6-4th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

06-03-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

13-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

30-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

02-09-2022
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by Respondent No. 2 to set aside the 'No W.S.' order against Respondent No. 3 was allowed by the Joint Civil Judge, Karad on 02.09.2022. The 'No W.S.' order passed on 26.04.2019 was set aside, and Respondent No. 3's Written Statement was permitted to be taken on record upon payment of costs of Rs. 100, allowing the government body to contest the proceeding on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by Respondent No. 2 to set aside the 'No W.S.' order against Respondent No. 3 was allowed by the Joint Civil Judge, Karad on 02.09.2022. The 'No W.S.' order passed on 26.04.2019 was set aside, and Respondent No. 3's Written Statement was permitted to be taken on record upon payment of costs of Rs. 100, allowing the government body to contest the proceeding on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case