Varsha Atul Kulkarni vs Ram janardhan Jagtap Advocate - Patil A.D. — 476/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Money. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST050006692016
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
476/2016
Filing Date
19-11-2016
Registration No
476/2016
Registration Date
19-11-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Varsha Atul Kulkarni
Adv. Nigadkar S.P.
Respondent(s)
Ram janardhan Jagtap Advocate - Patil A.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Evidence Part Heard
Amended W.S.
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Amended W.S. |
| 23-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 09-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 22-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
The court order is in Marathi and concerns a civil petition (Petition No. 476/2016, Ruling No. 53) from the Karad Court. Summary: The petition is partially allowed (अंशात: मंजूर). The court directed the defendant to file proper affidavits within 14 days from the date of the order providing account details and bank information regarding various monetary transactions totaling Rs. 3,13,000/-, Rs. 1,73,000/-, Rs. 40,000/-, and Rs. 1,00,000/- claimed to have been transferred on specific dates in 2016. The court found the plaintiff's claims regarding the nature of these transactions with certain parties to be disputed and partially merit further documentary verification before final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order is in Marathi and concerns a civil petition (Petition No. 476/2016, Ruling No. 53) from the Karad Court. Summary: The petition is partially allowed (अंशात: मंजूर). The court directed the defendant to file proper affidavits within 14 days from the date of the order providing account details and bank information regarding various monetary transactions totaling Rs. 3,13,000/-, Rs. 1,73,000/-, Rs. 40,000/-, and Rs. 1,00,000/- claimed to have been transferred on specific dates in 2016. The court found the plaintiff's claims regarding the nature of these transactions with certain parties to be disputed and partially merit further documentary verification before final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts