Amit Dilip Mandale vs Dilip Yashwant Mandale Advocate - Patil A. B. — 50/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Partation. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST050006502016
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
50/2016
Filing Date
29-01-2016
Registration No
50/2016
Registration Date
29-01-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amit Dilip Mandale
Adv. Pawar D.D
Respondent(s)
Dilip Yashwant Mandale Advocate - Patil A. B.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Defence Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 26-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 13-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In RCS No. 50/2016, the 2nd Joint Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Karad granted the plaintiff's application to produce a document dated 20/02/2025. The court held that production of a document and proof of a document are distinct matters, and mere production would not prejudice the defendant. The defendants were absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In RCS No. 50/2016, the 2nd Joint Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Karad granted the plaintiff's application to produce a document dated 20/02/2025. The court held that production of a document and proof of a document are distinct matters, and mere production would not prejudice the defendant. The defendants were absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts