Mohan Ganpati Patil vs Maharashtra govt through Collector — 743/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section declaration. Status: Ex_Party Hearing. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST050006242021

Ex_Party Hearing

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

624/2021

Filing Date

09-04-2021

Registration No

743/2021

Registration Date

16-08-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karad

Judge

4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section declaration

Petitioner(s)

Mohan Ganpati Patil

Adv. Zad A.J.

Shivaji Bhimrao Patil

Manik Bhimrao Patil

Sangita Sambhaji Patil

Indrajit Sambhaji Patil

Ranjit Sambhaji Patil

Ranjana Sambhaji Patil

Respondent(s)

Maharashtra govt through Collector

Upvibhagiy Adhikarisaheb Karad Bhag

Tehsildar Karad

Pandurang Narsinha Kale

Gopal Ramkrishna Kale

Pralhad Ramkrishna Kale

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad

18-03-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

06-03-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

12-02-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

12-01-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

22-12-2025

Ex_Party Hearing

Interim Orders

07-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the petition and directed that the summons against respondents 4-6 be served through publication in newspapers and official gazettes, as their exact addresses could not be established despite multiple attempts at service. The order further instructed that upon proper service through publication, the summons against respondents 4-6 shall be deemed validly served for proceeding with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition and directed that the summons against respondents 4-6 be served through publication in newspapers and official gazettes, as their exact addresses could not be established despite multiple attempts at service. The order further instructed that upon proper service through publication, the summons against respondents 4-6 shall be deemed validly served for proceeding with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Karad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case