Prakash Hanmantrao Chavan vs Rita Pankaj Ghathani — 212/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Recovery. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHST050004802021
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
480/2021
Filing Date
08-06-2021
Registration No
212/2021
Registration Date
08-06-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
5-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash Hanmantrao Chavan
Adv. Desai M.T
Rajendra Hanmatrao Chavan
Satish Hanmatrao Chavan
Respondent(s)
Rita Pankaj Ghathani
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Order Summary The defendant's application for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(b) and (d) of the CPC was rejected. The court held that the limitation issue is a mixed question of law and fact requiring full inquiry with evidence, and therefore cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage. The court also noted the defendant challenged both the documents' genuineness and the suit's timeliness, making early dismissal inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order Summary The defendant's application for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(b) and (d) of the CPC was rejected. The court held that the limitation issue is a mixed question of law and fact requiring full inquiry with evidence, and therefore cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage. The court also noted the defendant challenged both the documents' genuineness and the suit's timeliness, making early dismissal inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts