Jyoti Somnath Gurav vs No Body Advocate - Shinde B.J — 103/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Succession. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHST050004622015
Filing Number
103/2015
Filing Date
08-10-2015
Registration No
103/2015
Registration Date
08-10-2015
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
2-Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jyoti Somnath Gurav
Adv. Mulay V.P
Sidhathn Somnath Gurav
Soham Somnath Gurav
Respondent(s)
No Body Advocate - Shinde B.J
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The civil court granted succession certificate under the Bombay Succession Act, 1827 to three applicants (Jyoti, Dhanshree, and Soham—the widow and two minor children of the deceased Somanath) as legitimate heirs entitled to inherit his property and assets. The court rejected objections from other claimants who lacked proper legal standing as successors under Hindu succession law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The civil court granted succession certificate under the Bombay Succession Act, 1827 to three applicants (Jyoti, Dhanshree, and Soham—the widow and two minor children of the deceased Somanath) as legitimate heirs entitled to inherit his property and assets. The court rejected objections from other claimants who lacked proper legal standing as successors under Hindu succession law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts