Sushila Tanaji Kachare vs Sharda @ Savita Jaywantrao Desai — 66/2023
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Status: Additional W.S.. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
Succession - Application for Succession Certificate
CNR: MHST050004382023
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
13-06-2023
Filing Number
442/2023
Filing Date
13-06-2023
Registration No
66/2023
Registration Date
14-06-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sushila Tanaji Kachare
Adv. Digvijay Patil
Respondent(s)
Sharda @ Savita Jaywantrao Desai
Samir Jaywantrao Desai
Sagar Jaywantrao Desai
Jayshri Rajaram Patil
Mahesh Ranaram Patil
Rajesh Rajaram Patil
Branch Manager, Bank of Maharashtra
Branch Manager, H.D.F.C. Bank
Branch Manager, I.C.I.C.I. Bank
Branch Manager, Satara District Co-Operative Bank Ltd.,
Branch Manager, Satara District Co-Operative Bank Ltd.,
Branch Manager, Satara District Co-Operative Bank Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Additional W.S.
Compliance
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Additional W.S. |
| 07-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 26-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Miscellaneous Civil (Succession) Application No. 66/2023 | Court: 3rd Civil Judge, Karad, Satara Outcome: The petition for amendment/rectification (rustication) of the original succession certificate application was dismissed with a fine. The applicant (Sushila) is ordered to pay a penalty of ₹500, and the respondent (Sharda) is not bound by any amended application unless the penalty is paid. The applicant has been granted three months to file a properly amended application with supporting documents attached. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Miscellaneous Civil (Succession) Application No. 66/2023 | Court: 3rd Civil Judge, Karad, Satara Outcome: The petition for amendment/rectification (rustication) of the original succession certificate application was dismissed with a fine. The applicant (Sushila) is ordered to pay a penalty of ₹500, and the respondent (Sharda) is not bound by any amended application unless the penalty is paid. The applicant has been granted three months to file a properly amended application with supporting documents attached. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts