Bank Of India Karad vs Sahebrao Bharat Shinde — 47/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section recovery. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHST050001302019
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
Filing Number
130/2019
Filing Date
15-02-2019
Registration No
47/2019
Registration Date
15-02-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
6-4th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank Of India Karad
Adv. Pawar S B
Respondent(s)
Sahebrao Bharat Shinde
Chairman Yashwantrao Mohite Krishna Sahakari Sadhar Karkhana Ltd. Rethare (BK)
Managing Director Yashwantrao Mohite Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Rethare (BK)
Hearing History
Judge: 6-4th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 19-09-2025 | Evidence |
| 13-06-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by defendants 2A and 2B (society) to set aside the "No Written Statement" order, permitting them to file their written statement in the suit filed by Bank of India. The defendants' request was granted considering their reasons (busy crushing season and difficulty managing documents amid 700+ similar suits) and their right to present a defense. Defendants were ordered to bear the costs of the present application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by defendants 2A and 2B (society) to set aside the "No Written Statement" order, permitting them to file their written statement in the suit filed by Bank of India. The defendants' request was granted considering their reasons (busy crushing season and difficulty managing documents amid 700+ similar suits) and their right to present a defense. Defendants were ordered to bear the costs of the present application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts