Alataf A Gani Kazi vs Shama Sikandar Kazi (Deceased) — 2/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Recvoery. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHST050000852020
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
Filing Number
86/2020
Filing Date
07-02-2020
Registration No
2/2020
Registration Date
12-02-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alataf A Gani Kazi
Adv. Jadhav N.B.
Respondent(s)
Shama Sikandar Kazi (Deceased)
Shafik A. Gani Kazi
Rafik A. Gani Kazi
Ekabal A Gani Kazi (Deceased)(Legal Heir)
Vahida Tayyab Kazi
Joharabi A. Gani Kazi
Nujahat Shabbir Mujavar
Farahin Fayyaj Mulla
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Awaiting Notice
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 25-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 10-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court allowed the petition filed by defendants 6-8 to rectify the primary decree in civil case no. 129/2012. The court held that properties 1A and 1B are separate and distinct; defendants 6-8 are entitled to 1/3 share (as per Islamic law bequest), while the remaining 2/3 of property 1B is available for partition among all legal heirs with defendants 6-8 receiving 7/72 share therein. The court directed the Court Commissioner to verify the property identification and correct the primary decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court allowed the petition filed by defendants 6-8 to rectify the primary decree in civil case no. 129/2012. The court held that properties 1A and 1B are separate and distinct; defendants 6-8 are entitled to 1/3 share (as per Islamic law bequest), while the remaining 2/3 of property 1B is available for partition among all legal heirs with defendants 6-8 receiving 7/72 share therein. The court directed the Court Commissioner to verify the property identification and correct the primary decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts