Jaywant Sugars Ltd. Through Ramesh Sarjerao Nalwade vs Raghunath Dnyandev Dhagale Advocate - Kadam Ravindra Dattatray — 12/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38,39. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHST050000732024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
e-Filing Number
24-01-2024
Filing Number
79/2024
Filing Date
25-01-2024
Registration No
12/2024
Registration Date
25-01-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Karad
Judge
6-4th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jaywant Sugars Ltd. Through Ramesh Sarjerao Nalwade
Adv. Arvind Ghate
Respondent(s)
Raghunath Dnyandev Dhagale Advocate - Kadam Ravindra Dattatray
Shivaji Raghunath Dhagale
Ramchandra Dnyandev Dhagale
Shabutai Anandrao Dhagale
Sujata Ranjendra Mhaskar
Dipak Shankar Dhagale
Krushnat Balkrushna kanase
Hearing History
Judge: 6-4th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karad
Compliance
Compliance
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 30-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 02-01-2026 | Written Statement |
| 28-11-2025 | Written Statement |
| 07-11-2025 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary The application filed by Defendants 1-5 to set aside the deemed "No Written Statement" order is allowed. The court set aside the deemed order on grounds of illness causing delay in filing the written statement, prioritizing merit-based adjudication over procedural technicalities. Defendants are required to pay costs of Rs. 100 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The application filed by Defendants 1-5 to set aside the deemed "No Written Statement" order is allowed. The court set aside the deemed order on grounds of illness causing delay in filing the written statement, prioritizing merit-based adjudication over procedural technicalities. Defendants are required to pay costs of Rs. 100 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts