Gorakh Tatyaba Kamale(Legal Heir) vs Bhausaheb Babasaheb Chavan Advocate - Barsawade P.K — 107/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39 rule5. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHST010028312025
e-Filing Number
21-11-2025
Filing Number
2057/2025
Filing Date
21-Nov-2025
Registration No
107/2025
Registration Date
24-Nov-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Satara
Judge
5-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gorakh Tatyaba Kamale(Legal Heir)
Adv. Bhutkar A.D.1.
-
2.Sharad Gorakh Kambale
Adv. Amol bhutkar1.
-
3.Sandip Ghorakh Kambale
Adv. Amol bhutkar1.
-
4.Sandesh Ghorakh Kambale
Adv. Amol bhutkar1.
-
5.Deepak Ghorakh Kambale
Adv. Amol bhutkar1.
-
6.Ujwala Hindurao More
Adv. Amol bhutkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhausaheb Babasaheb Chavan Advocate - Barsawade P.K
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Ad-hoc District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal against the rejection of their temporary injunction application. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership over the disputed 114.90 sq meter agricultural land (City Survey No. 732) in Satara, as the defendants' names were validly mutated in revenue records pursuant to a 2021 compromise decree. The court further ruled that an independent suit to challenge a compromise decree is barred under Order XXIII Rule 3-A of the CPC, and without proof of possession or a maintainable suit, interim relief cannot be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
21-Jan-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
15-Jan-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
09-Jan-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
07-Jan-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
02-Jan-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
19-Dec-2025
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
11-Dec-2025
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
05-Dec-2025
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
28-Nov-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
27-Nov-2025
Awaiting Notice
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
-
25-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 107/2025
Summary The Ad-hoc District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal against the rejection of their temporary injunction application. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership over the disputed 114.90 sq meter agricultural land (City Survey No. 732) in Satara, as the defendants' names were validly mutated in revenue records pursuant to a 2021 compromise decree. The court further ruled that an independent suit to challenge a compromise decree is barred under Order XXIII Rule 3-A of the CPC, and without proof of possession or a maintainable suit, interim relief cannot be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts