Vijaysingh jagannath bhoite vs Amrutrao Narayan Dhumal, deceased Advocate - Kadam S.K1. — 89/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,O41. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHST010027362024

e-Filing Number

12-12-2024

Filing Number

1848/2024

Filing Date

13-Dec-2024

Registration No

89/2024

Registration Date

16-Dec-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

1-Principal District Judge Satara

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,O41

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijaysingh jagannath bhoite

    Adv. Gaikwad prasad H.

  2. 2.Prashant Vijaysingh Bhoite

    Adv. GAIKWAD PRASAD HANAMANTRAO

  3. 3.Pravin Vijaysingh bhoite

    Adv. GAIKWAD PRASAD HANAMANTRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amrutrao Narayan Dhumal, deceased Advocate - Kadam S.K1.

  2. 2.Prabhavati Amrutrao Dhumal 1.

  3. 3.Shashikant Amrutrao Dhumal 1.

  4. 4.Prashant Amrutrao Dhumal 1.

  5. 5.Jitendra Amrutrao Dhumal 1.

  6. 6.Swati Pravin Jadhav

  7. 7.Shamrao Narayan Dhumal, deceased 2.

  8. 8.Lilavati Shamrao Dhumal 2.

  9. 9.Yogesh Shamrao Dhumal 2.

  10. 10.Bharati Pradip Jadhav 2.

  11. 11.Jyoti Pravin Chavan 2.

  12. 12.Rupali Shrikant Dhumal 2.

  13. 13.Janhavi Shrikant Dhumal

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  11. 31-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  12. 12-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge Satara

  15. 27-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-3 Satara

  16. 25-Apr-2025

    Awaiting R and P

    District Judge-3 Satara

  17. 04-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-3 Satara

  18. 21-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The respondent's adjournment application was rejected. The court found the appellant's paper book with depositions was complete, and documents in the trial court C file would be automatically available during appeal proceedings. However, as a final opportunity, the respondent was granted last chance to file their say with specific directions to proceed positively on the next date, considering the appellant (age 72) is a senior citizen requiring expedited hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-3 Satara

  20. 07-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  21. 21-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  22. 07-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  23. 17-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  24. 10-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  25. 03-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  26. 18-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 13-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The respondent's adjournment application was rejected. The court found the appellant's paper book with depositions was complete, and documents in the trial court C file would be automatically available during appeal proceedings. However, as a final opportunity, the respondent was granted last chance to file their say with specific directions to proceed positively on the next date, considering the appellant (age 72) is a senior citizen requiring expedited hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case