Vijaysingh jagannath bhoite vs Amrutrao Narayan Dhumal, deceased Advocate - Kadam S.K1. — 89/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,O41. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHST010027362024

Arguments

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

12-12-2024

Filing Number

1848/2024

Filing Date

13-12-2024

Registration No

89/2024

Registration Date

16-12-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

1-Principal District Judge Satara

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,O41

Petitioner(s)

Vijaysingh jagannath bhoite

Adv. Gaikwad prasad H.

Prashant Vijaysingh Bhoite

Adv. GAIKWAD PRASAD HANAMANTRAO

Pravin Vijaysingh bhoite

Adv. GAIKWAD PRASAD HANAMANTRAO

Respondent(s)

Amrutrao Narayan Dhumal, deceased Advocate - Kadam S.K1.

Prabhavati Amrutrao Dhumal 1.

Shashikant Amrutrao Dhumal 1.

Prashant Amrutrao Dhumal 1.

Jitendra Amrutrao Dhumal 1.

Swati Pravin Jadhav

Shamrao Narayan Dhumal, deceased 2.

Lilavati Shamrao Dhumal 2.

Yogesh Shamrao Dhumal 2.

Bharati Pradip Jadhav 2.

Jyoti Pravin Chavan 2.

Rupali Shrikant Dhumal 2.

Janhavi Shrikant Dhumal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge Satara

20-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Arguments

12-02-2026

Arguments

06-02-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

21-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The respondent's adjournment application was rejected. The court found the appellant's paper book with depositions was complete, and documents in the trial court C file would be automatically available during appeal proceedings. However, as a final opportunity, the respondent was granted last chance to file their say with specific directions to proceed positively on the next date, considering the appellant (age 72) is a senior citizen requiring expedited hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The respondent's adjournment application was rejected. The court found the appellant's paper book with depositions was complete, and documents in the trial court C file would be automatically available during appeal proceedings. However, as a final opportunity, the respondent was granted last chance to file their say with specific directions to proceed positively on the next date, considering the appellant (age 72) is a senior citizen requiring expedited hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Satara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case