Maharashtra State vs Ketan Suresh Farande Advocate - Bhosale J.P. — 102/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,379,201. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHST010015032022

Filing Number

757/2022

Filing Date

03-Jun-2022

Registration No

102/2022

Registration Date

08-Jun-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

5-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 353,379,201

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ketan Suresh Farande Advocate - Bhosale J.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge in Satara acquitted accused Ketan Suresh Pharande of charges under IPC Sections 353 (criminal force against public servant), 379 (theft), and 201 (destruction of evidence). The court found the prosecution's case unreliable, citing unexplained 6-hour delay in FIR filing, inconsistent witness testimony, lack of direct evidence of criminal force, and failure to establish essential ingredients of the alleged offences. The court held that illegal sand transportation falls under special legislation, not general theft provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  12. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  13. 23-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  14. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  16. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  17. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  19. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  20. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  21. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  22. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  23. 13-May-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  24. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  25. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  26. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  27. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  28. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge Satara

  29. 04-Dec-2024

    B.W._Ready

    Principal District Judge Satara

  30. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  31. 08-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  32. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  33. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  34. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  35. 13-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  36. 17-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  37. 02-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  38. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  39. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  40. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District Judge Satara

  41. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  42. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  43. 07-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  44. 06-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-3 Satara

  45. 04-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-3 Satara

  46. 02-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-3 Satara

  47. 08-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-3 Satara

  48. 14-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-4 Satara

  49. 28-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-4 Satara

  50. 22-May-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-4 Satara

  51. 27-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-4 Satara

  52. 31-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  53. 10-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  54. 04-Mar-2023

    Charge

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  55. 17-Feb-2023

    Charge

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  56. 10-Feb-2023

    Charge

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  57. 20-Jan-2023

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  58. 13-Dec-2022

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  59. 07-Nov-2022

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  60. 03-Oct-2022

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  61. 06-Sep-2022

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  62. 03-Aug-2022

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  63. 11-Jul-2022

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  64. 08-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 03-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge in Satara acquitted accused Ketan Suresh Pharande of charges under IPC Sections 353 (criminal force against public servant), 379 (theft), and 201 (destruction of evidence). The court found the prosecution's case unreliable, citing unexplained 6-hour delay in FIR filing, inconsistent witness testimony, lack of direct evidence of criminal force, and failure to establish essential ingredients of the alleged offences. The court held that illegal sand transportation falls under special legislation, not general theft provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case