Maharashtra State through Satara city Polic Statin vs Yash Suresh Shinde Advocate - Chavan D.S. — 28/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34,394,397,504,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 04-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHST010007462024

Filing Number

357/2024

Filing Date

19-Apr-2024

Registration No

28/2024

Registration Date

23-Apr-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

5-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 34,394,397,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State through Satara city Polic Statin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yash Suresh Shinde Advocate - Chavan D.S.

  2. 2.Akshay Madhukar Tupe

Case History

  1. 04-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  13. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  14. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  16. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  17. 20-Sep-2025

    ChargeView PDF

    Summary: Two accused, Yash Suresh Shinde (24) and Akshay Madhukar Tupe (22), have been formally charged by the Satara Sessions Court for committing armed robbery on 11/07/2023. The charges include robbery with a deadly weapon (sickle), voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and insulting language under IPC Sections 394, 397, 504, and 506 (read with Section 34). The court has directed that both accused be tried on these charges, and the charge has been read over and explained to them in the vernacular language. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 20-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  19. 19-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 19-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  21. 16-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara

  22. 29-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    District Judge-4 Satara

  23. 16-May-2025

    Compliance

    District Judge-3 Satara

  24. 25-Mar-2025

    Compliance

    District Judge-4 Satara

  25. 21-Jan-2025

    Compliance

    District Judge-3 Satara

  26. 21-Nov-2024

    Compliance

    District Judge-3 Satara

  27. 04-Oct-2024

    Compliance

    District Judge-3 Satara

  28. 23-Aug-2024

    Compliance

    District Judge-3 Satara

  29. 04-Jul-2024

    Compliance

    District Judge-3 Satara

  30. 29-May-2024

    Compliance

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  31. 06-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 19-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Two accused, Yash Suresh Shinde (24) and Akshay Madhukar Tupe (22), have been formally charged by the Satara Sessions Court for committing armed robbery on 11/07/2023. The charges include robbery with a deadly weapon (sickle), voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and insulting language under IPC Sections 394, 397, 504, and 506 (read with Section 34). The court has directed that both accused be tried on these charges, and the charge has been read over and explained to them in the vernacular language. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case