Maharashtra State through Satara city Polic Statin vs Yash Suresh Shinde Advocate - Chavan D.S. — 28/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34,394,397,504,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHST010007462024
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
357/2024
Filing Date
19-04-2024
Registration No
28/2024
Registration Date
23-04-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court , Satara
Judge
5-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State through Satara city Polic Statin
Respondent(s)
Yash Suresh Shinde Advocate - Chavan D.S.
Akshay Madhukar Tupe
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 Satara
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: Two accused, Yash Suresh Shinde (24) and Akshay Madhukar Tupe (22), have been formally charged by the Satara Sessions Court for committing armed robbery on 11/07/2023. The charges include robbery with a deadly weapon (sickle), voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and insulting language under IPC Sections 394, 397, 504, and 506 (read with Section 34). The court has directed that both accused be tried on these charges, and the charge has been read over and explained to them in the vernacular language. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Two accused, Yash Suresh Shinde (24) and Akshay Madhukar Tupe (22), have been formally charged by the Satara Sessions Court for committing armed robbery on 11/07/2023. The charges include robbery with a deadly weapon (sickle), voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and insulting language under IPC Sections 394, 397, 504, and 506 (read with Section 34). The court has directed that both accused be tried on these charges, and the charge has been read over and explained to them in the vernacular language. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts