Shivraj Pankaj Kanse vs Maharashtra State — 81/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHST010005042026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

81/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

3-District Judge-2 Satara.

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123,125,278

Indian Penal Code Section 328,337,276

Petitioner(s)

1.Shivraj Pankaj Kanse

Adv. Nikam A. R.

Respondent(s)

1.Maharashtra State

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court granted bail to applicant Shivraj Kanse, accused of possessing and attempting to sell Mephentermine Sulphate injections without prescription, finding no prima facie case under Section 123 of the BNS and determining the remaining offences are bailable. The bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 personal and surety bonds with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, attendance before investigating officer, and residence restrictions until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Mar-2026

Disposed

District Judge-2 Satara.
09-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

District Judge-2 Satara.
06-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

District Judge-2 Satara.
04-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
02-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 81/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to applicant Shivraj Kanse, accused of possessing and attempting to sell Mephentermine Sulphate injections without prescription, finding no prima facie case under Section 123 of the BNS and determining the remaining offences are bailable. The bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 personal and surety bonds with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, attendance before investigating officer, and residence restrictions until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.