Mayur Dilip Vibhute vs Maharashtra State — 82/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHST010005032026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

168/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

82/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

3-District Judge-2 Satara.

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439
Indian Penal Code Section 397,385

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mayur Dilip Vibhute

    Adv. Sawant Sangram Sanjay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara granted bail to applicant Mayur Dilip Vibhute in a case involving alleged extortion and assault at a hotel. The court found that the applicant's name does not appear in the FIR or CCTV footage, and since co-accused were already released on bail, the principle of parity applied; stringent conditions addressed evidence tampering concerns. The applicant was released on bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including non-interference with witnesses and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 82/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara granted bail to applicant Mayur Dilip Vibhute in a case involving alleged extortion and assault at a hotel. The court found that the applicant's name does not appear in the FIR or CCTV footage, and since co-accused were already released on bail, the principle of parity applied; stringent conditions addressed evidence tampering concerns. The applicant was released on bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including non-interference with witnesses and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case