Shourya Sachin Mane vs Maharashtra State — 68/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--BAIL REFUSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHST010004222026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

141/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

68/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

6-District Judge-1 Satara

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 482
Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shourya Sachin Mane

    Adv. Bebale C.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Shourya Sachin Mane in an assault case involving grievous injury (fractured frontal bone). The judge found the gravity of offense serious, noted the accused evaded arrest for months indicating disregard for law, and determined the co-accused's bail was not applicable precedent since he was arrested before bail was granted, unlike the present applicant seeking pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 Satara

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Satara

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Satara

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Satara

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 Satara

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-1 Satara

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Shourya Sachin Mane in an assault case involving grievous injury (fractured frontal bone). The judge found the gravity of offense serious, noted the accused evaded arrest for months indicating disregard for law, and determined the co-accused's bail was not applicable precedent since he was arrested before bail was granted, unlike the present applicant seeking pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case