Aryan Chandrakant Bansode vs The state of Maharashtra through Satara City Police Station — 65/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--BAIL REFUSED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHST010003962026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
131/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
65/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Satara
Judge
6-District Judge-1 Satara
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--BAIL REFUSED
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aryan Chandrakant Bansode
Adv. Salunkhe H. S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The state of Maharashtra through Satara City Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Satara Additional Sessions Judge rejected Aryan Chandrakant Bansode's pre-arrest bail application in a case involving assault charges under IPC sections 324 and 323. The court found the offense grave—the informant sustained a displaced and commuted frontal bone fracture from an iron rod blow—and determined that the accused's evasion since the May 2024 incident demonstrated he was not law-abiding, making pre-arrest bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 Satara
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 Satara
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 Satara
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 Satara
-
06-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
District Judge-1 Satara
-
04-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
District Judge-1 Satara
-
25-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
District Judge-1 Satara
-
20-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
District Judge-1 Satara
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2026
Summary: The Satara Additional Sessions Judge rejected Aryan Chandrakant Bansode's pre-arrest bail application in a case involving assault charges under IPC sections 324 and 323. The court found the offense grave—the informant sustained a displaced and commuted frontal bone fracture from an iron rod blow—and determined that the accused's evasion since the May 2024 incident demonstrated he was not law-abiding, making pre-arrest bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts