Sanjay Manohar Bachal vs Dhawalchandra Balkrushana Doshi Advocate - Barsawade P.K — 15/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHST010003932023
Filing Number
204/2023
Filing Date
17-Feb-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
22-Feb-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Satara
Judge
3-District Judge-2 Satara.
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanjay Manohar Bachal
Adv. Jadhav R.R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhawalchandra Balkrushana Doshi Advocate - Barsawade P.K
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
09-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
28-Nov-2025
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
12-Sep-2025
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
18-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
27-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
11-Apr-2025
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
07-Mar-2025
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
24-Jan-2025
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
20-Dec-2024
Arguments
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
08-Nov-2024
Awaiting R and P
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
27-Sep-2024
Awaiting R and P
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
30-Aug-2024
Awaiting R and P
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
12-Aug-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The defendant's application to stay execution of a Rs. 2,00,000 money decree (pending appeal) was rejected. The court held that since the decree took 16½ years to be decided and the elderly plaintiff (now 75 years) urgently needs funds for medical treatment, staying execution is unjustified. As an alternative, the defendant may furnish security or bank guarantee of the decreetal amount with interest and expedite the appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Aug-2024
Awaiting R and P
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
26-Jul-2024
Order on Exh
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
21-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
19-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
15-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
16-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
06-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
20-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
19-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
12-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
05-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
15-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-1 Satara
-
24-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
27-Oct-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
06-Oct-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
08-Sep-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
11-Aug-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 Satara.
-
21-Jul-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-3 Satara
-
30-Jun-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-3 Satara
-
23-Jun-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-3 Satara
-
21-Apr-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-3 Satara
-
29-Mar-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-3 Satara
-
02-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2023
Summary: The defendant's application to stay execution of a Rs. 2,00,000 money decree (pending appeal) was rejected. The court held that since the decree took 16½ years to be decided and the elderly plaintiff (now 75 years) urgently needs funds for medical treatment, staying execution is unjustified. As an alternative, the defendant may furnish security or bank guarantee of the decreetal amount with interest and expedite the appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts