Pravin Shivaji Adsul vs Maharashtra State — 62/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHST010003822026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

128/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

3-District Judge-2 Satara.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Pravin Shivaji Adsul

Adv. Jadhav Ketan V

Respondent(s)

Maharashtra State

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-2 Satara.

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

04-03-2026

Reply/Say

16-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara granted anticipatory bail to Pravin Shivaji Adsul in a case involving abetment to suicide under BNS Sections 108 and 3(5), finding no prima facie case against him despite charges related to a police officer's suicide. The court relied on the deceased's suicide note being silent about the applicant's involvement, vague allegations regarding video calls, the applicant's cooperation with investigation, permanent residence, and ability to provide stringent conditions to prevent witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara granted anticipatory bail to Pravin Shivaji Adsul in a case involving abetment to suicide under BNS Sections 108 and 3(5), finding no prima facie case against him despite charges related to a police officer's suicide. The court relied on the deceased's suicide note being silent about the applicant's involvement, vague allegations regarding video calls, the applicant's cooperation with investigation, permanent residence, and ability to provide stringent conditions to prevent witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Satara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case