Pravin Balaso Falle vs Maharashtra State — 44/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHST010002422026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

78/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

44/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

3-District Judge-2 Satara.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),314,316(2),317(4),318(4),323,61(2),115(2),351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Pravin Balaso Falle

Adv. Godase M.S.

Respondent(s)

Maharashtra State

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-2 Satara.

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Arguments

04-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara dismissed Pravin Balaso Falle's bail application under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant, a service engineer, inserted a chip into the weighing scale at a sugar mill on the directions of co-accused to facilitate a conspiracy involving Rs. 4.93 crore fraud, received Rs. 1 lakh in bribe, and actively participated in cheating the factory. Given the serious nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, and risk of evidence tampering, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara dismissed Pravin Balaso Falle's bail application under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant, a service engineer, inserted a chip into the weighing scale at a sugar mill on the directions of co-accused to facilitate a conspiracy involving Rs. 4.93 crore fraud, received Rs. 1 lakh in bribe, and actively participated in cheating the factory. Given the serious nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, and risk of evidence tampering, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Satara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case