Somnath Brijalal Bhatiya vs Ankush Bhagwan Gore Advocate - Khot A.S — 11/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHST010002132023
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
85/2023
Filing Date
18-01-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
31-01-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Satara
Judge
3-District Judge-2 Satara.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Somnath Brijalal Bhatiya
Adv. Mulla Z.D.
Vivek Ashok Bhatiya
Respondent(s)
Ankush Bhagwan Gore Advocate - Khot A.S
Subhash Dada Mali
Bharati Ankush Gore
Subhash Ramchandra Dekane (deleted)
Anant Ramchandra Dhekane PoA Pradeep Anant Dhekane
Narher Ramchandra Dhekane thro PA Pradeep Anant Dhekane 6.
Suvidha Dilip Bidkar 6.
Sumedha Satish Karpe 6.
Vasudha Sameer Chitrav 6.
Seema Shirish Inamdar
Ravindra Vishvnath Karanjekar (Dekhane)
Jayashri Suhas Kuber
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 Satara.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary In Regular Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2023 before the District Judge-2, Satara, the court allowed the appellants' application to produce additional evidence in rebuttal. The judge held that since respondent No. 1 was permitted to file additional evidence (a measurement map prepared during the appeal), the appellants had a corresponding right under natural justice principles to lead rebuttal evidence to counter that evidence, relying on Supreme Court precedents in *Akhilesh Singh v. Lal Babu Singh* and *Shalimar Chemical Works v. Surendra Oil and Dal Mills*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Regular Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2023 before the District Judge-2, Satara, the court allowed the appellants' application to produce additional evidence in rebuttal. The judge held that since respondent No. 1 was permitted to file additional evidence (a measurement map prepared during the appeal), the appellants had a corresponding right under natural justice principles to lead rebuttal evidence to counter that evidence, relying on Supreme Court precedents in *Akhilesh Singh v. Lal Babu Singh* and *Shalimar Chemical Works v. Surendra Oil and Dal Mills*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts