YOGESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN vs Maharashtra State — 37/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHST010001972026

e-Filing Number

21-01-2026

Filing Number

63/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

3-District Judge-2 Satara.

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOGESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN

    Adv. SHINDE VIJAYANAND SHANKARRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara dismissed Yogesh Shivaji Chavan's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNS. The court held it lacked jurisdiction to cancel the non-bailable warrant issued by the Family Court at Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ruled that only the issuing court could cancel such warrant. The applicant was required to approach the Family Court to resolve the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 Satara.

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara dismissed Yogesh Shivaji Chavan's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNS. The court held it lacked jurisdiction to cancel the non-bailable warrant issued by the Family Court at Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ruled that only the issuing court could cancel such warrant. The applicant was required to approach the Family Court to resolve the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case