Nitinkumar Prabhakar Saner vs The President, Gramvikas Shikashan Mandal, Marvad, Tal.Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon. Advocate - Gangurde Suresh D. — 38/2024
Case under Mah.employees of Private School Conditions of Service Regulation Act, 1977 Section 9. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Appeal
CNR: MHSS150000562024
Filing Number
56/2024
Filing Date
06-Sep-2024
Registration No
38/2024
Registration Date
06-Sep-2024
Court
School Tribunal, Nashik Region, Nashik
Judge
1-Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nitinkumar Prabhakar Saner
Adv. Patil Yogesh M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The President, Gramvikas Shikashan Mandal, Marvad, Tal.Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon. Advocate - Gangurde Suresh D.
-
2.The Secretary, Gramvikas Shikashan Mandal, Marvad, Tal.Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon.
Adv. Gangurde Suresh D.
-
3.Mr.Luxmikant Namdeo Saidane, C/o. New English School, Pra.Dangari, Tal.Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon.
Adv. Gangurde Suresh D.
-
4.The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad Jalgaon
-
5.The Superintendent, Pay and Provident Fund (Secondary),Zillaparishad, Dist.Jalgaon
-
6.Manoj Himmatrao Salunke, Chaukashi Samitti, Gramvikas Shikashan Mandal, Marvad, Tal.Amalner, Dist. J
Adv. Gangurde Suresh D.
-
7.Sanjay Ramdas Sonwane Member Chaukashi Samitti, Gramvikas Shikashan Mandal, Marvad, Tal.Amalner, Dis
Adv. Gangurde Suresh D.
-
8.Devidas Shamrao Patil, Controller Chaukashi Samitti, Gramvikas Shikashan Mandal, Marvad, Tal.Amalner
Adv. Gangurde Suresh D.
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
25-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In Appeal No. 38/2024 before the School Tribunal Nashik, the Presiding Officer allowed the production of documents filed by Respondent No.1, which included copies of an order from Writ Petition No.7911/2025. The tribunal found these documents necessary to decide the appeal on merits and ruled that allowing their production would not prejudice the appellant, who retains the right to counter them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
11-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
04-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
07-Jan-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
28-Nov-2025
Arguments
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
29-Oct-2025
Arguments
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
24-Sep-2025
Arguments
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
10-Sep-2025
Arguments
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
23-Jul-2025
Arguments
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
11-Jun-2025
Documents
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
05-Mar-2025
Documents
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
12-Feb-2025
Documents
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
04-Feb-2025
Order
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
20-Jan-2025
Order
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
08-Jan-2025
Appearance
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
09-Dec-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
11-Nov-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer School Tribunal Nashik Region
-
09-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2024
Summary: In Appeal No. 38/2024 before the School Tribunal Nashik, the Presiding Officer allowed the production of documents filed by Respondent No.1, which included copies of an order from Writ Petition No.7911/2025. The tribunal found these documents necessary to decide the appeal on merits and ruled that allowing their production would not prejudice the appellant, who retains the right to counter them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts