Damodar Kashinath Mhase vs The President/Secretary, Jyotiba Education Society Advocate - P.S.Kulkarni, S.S.Shelar — 44/2022
Case under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools 1977 Section 9. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Main Appeal
CNR: MHSS120000772022
Filing Number
97/2022
Filing Date
16-Dec-2022
Registration No
44/2022
Registration Date
16-Dec-2022
Court
School Tribunal, Pune
Judge
1-Presiding Officer
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Damodar Kashinath Mhase
Adv. Y.G.Pawar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The President/Secretary, Jyotiba Education Society Advocate - P.S.Kulkarni, S.S.Shelar
-
2.The Head Master, Baburao MA Pawar Madhyamik Va Uccha Madhyamik Vidyalaya
-
3.The Education Officer Seconadary Zilla Parishad Pune
-
4.The Deputy Director Of Education, Pune Region
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
01-Apr-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
11-Mar-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
24-Feb-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
09-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The School Tribunal, Pune allowed the Respondents' application to produce documents on record regarding the Appellant's income sources and properties. The court found that since the Appellant claimed to be unemployed after termination, the Respondents must discharge their burden of proof by presenting evidence of the Appellant's gainful employment and income sources. The Appellant will have the opportunity to respond to these documents and file counter-evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
29-Jan-2026
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
16-Jan-2026
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
07-Jan-2026
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
01-Dec-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
11-Nov-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
10-Oct-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
24-Sep-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
02-Sep-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
29-Jul-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
08-Jul-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
13-Jun-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
09-Apr-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
13-Mar-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
17-Feb-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
06-Jan-2025
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
21-Nov-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
23-Oct-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
03-Oct-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
10-Sep-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
13-Aug-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
12-Jul-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
20-Jun-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
10-Apr-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
11-Mar-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
14-Feb-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
11-Jan-2024
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
07-Dec-2023
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
03-Nov-2023
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
06-Oct-2023
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
05-Sep-2023
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
04-Aug-2023
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
18-Jul-2023
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
04-Jul-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Jul-2023
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
13-Jun-2023
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
17-Apr-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Apr-2023
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
05-Apr-2023
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
02-Mar-2023
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
16-Feb-2023
Argument
Presiding Officer
-
30-Jan-2023
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
09-Jan-2023
Reply
Presiding Officer
-
02-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2022
Summary: The School Tribunal, Pune allowed the Respondents' application to produce documents on record regarding the Appellant's income sources and properties. The court found that since the Appellant claimed to be unemployed after termination, the Respondents must discharge their burden of proof by presenting evidence of the Appellant's gainful employment and income sources. The Appellant will have the opportunity to respond to these documents and file counter-evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts